↓ Skip to main content

Nme protein family evolutionary history, a vertebrate perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nme protein family evolutionary history, a vertebrate perspective
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Desvignes, Pierre Pontarotti, Christian Fauvel, Julien Bobe

Abstract

The Nme family, previously known as Nm23 or NDPK, is involved in various molecular processes including tumor metastasis and some members of the family, but not all, exhibit a Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinase (NDPK) activity. Ten genes are known in humans, in which some members have been extensively studied. In non-mammalian species, the Nme protein family has received, in contrast, far less attention. The picture of the vertebrate Nme family remains thus incomplete and orthology relationships with mammalian counterparts were only partially characterized. The present study therefore aimed at characterizing the Nme gene repertoire in vertebrates with special interest for teleosts, and providing a comprehensive overview of the Nme gene family evolutionary history in vertebrates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Unspecified 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 8 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,318
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,350
of 107,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.