↓ Skip to main content

The enigmatic mitochondrial genome of Rhabdopleura compacta(Pterobranchia) reveals insights into selection of an efficient tRNA system and supports monophyly of Ambulacraria

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The enigmatic mitochondrial genome of Rhabdopleura compacta(Pterobranchia) reveals insights into selection of an efficient tRNA system and supports monophyly of Ambulacraria
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marleen Perseke, Joerg Hetmank, Matthias Bernt, Peter F Stadler, Martin Schlegel, Detlef Bernhard

Abstract

The Hemichordata comprises solitary-living Enteropneusta and colonial-living Pterobranchia, sharing morphological features with both Chordata and Echinodermata. Despite their key role for understanding deuterostome evolution, hemichordate phylogeny is controversial and only few molecular data are available for phylogenetic analysis. Furthermore, mitochondrial sequences are completely lacking for pterobranchs. Therefore, we determined and analyzed the complete mitochondrial genome of the pterobranch Rhabdopleura compacta to elucidate deuterostome evolution. Thereby, we also gained important insights in mitochondrial tRNA evolution.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
Colombia 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 25 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,886,731
of 21,108,726 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,285
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,518
of 368,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,108,726 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.