↓ Skip to main content

Selected proceedings of the 2010 Summit on Translational Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selected proceedings of the 2010 Summit on Translational Bioinformatics
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-11-s9-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eneida A Mendonça, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 13%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,023
of 7,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,568
of 99,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#21
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.