↓ Skip to main content

Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods decimate populations of Anopheles malaria vectors in arid environments regardless of the local availability of favoured sugar-source blossoms

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods decimate populations of Anopheles malaria vectors in arid environments regardless of the local availability of favoured sugar-source blossoms
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

John C Beier, Günter C Müller, Weidong Gu, Kristopher L Arheart, Yosef Schlein

Abstract

Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods are a new and promising "attract and kill" strategy for mosquito control. Sugar-feeding female and male mosquitoes attracted to ATSB solutions, either sprayed on plants or in bait stations, ingest an incorporated low-risk toxin such as boric acid and are killed. This field study in the arid malaria-free oasis environment of Israel compares how the availability of a primary natural sugar source for Anopheles sergentii mosquitoes: flowering Acacia raddiana trees, affects the efficacy of ATSB methods for mosquito control.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 215 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 18%
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Master 32 14%
Other 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 51 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,700,251
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#613
of 5,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,707
of 247,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#10
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.