↓ Skip to main content

Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
633 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-6-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent S Huang, John W Krakauer

Abstract

Conventional neurorehabilitation appears to have little impact on impairment over and above that of spontaneous biological recovery. Robotic neurorehabilitation has the potential for a greater impact on impairment due to easy deployment, its applicability across of a wide range of motor impairment, its high measurement reliability, and the capacity to deliver high dosage and high intensity training protocols. We first describe current knowledge of the natural history of arm recovery after stroke and of outcome prediction in individual patients. Rehabilitation strategies and outcome measures for impairment versus function are compared. The topics of dosage, intensity, and time of rehabilitation are then discussed. Robots are particularly suitable for both rigorous testing and application of motor learning principles to neurorehabilitation. Computational motor control and learning principles derived from studies in healthy subjects are introduced in the context of robotic neurorehabilitation. Particular attention is paid to the idea of context, task generalization and training schedule. The assumptions that underlie the choice of both movement trajectory programmed into the robot and the degree of active participation required by subjects are examined. We consider rehabilitation as a general learning problem, and examine it from the perspective of theoretical learning frameworks such as supervised and unsupervised learning. We discuss the limitations of current robotic neurorehabilitation paradigms and suggest new research directions from the perspective of computational motor learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 633 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 598 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 21%
Student > Master 95 15%
Researcher 86 14%
Student > Bachelor 56 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 7%
Other 126 20%
Unknown 90 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 222 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 89 14%
Neuroscience 46 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 5%
Computer Science 29 5%
Other 111 18%
Unknown 106 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,843,688
of 24,805,946 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#398
of 1,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,866
of 103,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,805,946 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them