↓ Skip to main content

Ethnobotanical study of indigenous knowledge on medicinal plant use by traditional healers in Oshikoto region, Namibia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnobotanical study of indigenous knowledge on medicinal plant use by traditional healers in Oshikoto region, Namibia
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-7-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Cheikhyoussef, Martin Shapi, Kenneth Matengu, Hina Mu Ashekele

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish a regional profile of the indigenous knowledge system (IKS) for medicinal plant use and cultural practices associated with the healing process of these plants by traditional healers in the Oshikoto region, Namibia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 17%
Student > Master 43 14%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 72 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 27%
Environmental Science 27 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 7%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 84 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,993,551
of 24,494,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#166
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,364
of 112,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,494,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them