↓ Skip to main content

Sex, bugs and Haldane's rule: the nematode genus Pristionchus in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex, bugs and Haldane's rule: the nematode genus Pristionchus in the United States
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-3-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Herrmann, Werner E Mayer, Ralf J Sommer

Abstract

The nematode Pristionchus pacificus has been developed as a satellite organism in evolutionary developmental biology for comparison to Caenorhabditis elegans. Comparative studies have revealed major differences in the regulation of developmental processes between P. pacificus and C. elegans. To place evolutionary developmental biology and the observed developmental differences between species in a comprehensive evolutionary context, such studies have to be complemented with ecological aspects. Knowledge about the ecology of the organism in question might indicate specific environmental conditions that can result in developmental adaptations and could account for species differences in development. To this end, we have started to investigate the ecology of Pristionchus nematodes. In recent field studies in Western Europe we found six Pristionchus species that are closely associated with scarab beetles and the Colorado potato beetle. This Pristionchus-beetle association provides the unique opportunity to combine research in evolutionary developmental biology with ecology. However, it remains unknown how general these findings from Europe are on a global scale.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
United States 2 5%
Sweden 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 33 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 56%
Environmental Science 5 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#372
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,265
of 67,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.