↓ Skip to main content

Pedestrian injury and the built environment: an environmental scan of hotspots

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pedestrian injury and the built environment: an environmental scan of hotspots
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Schuurman, Jonathan Cinnamon, Valorie A Crooks, S Morad Hameed

Abstract

Pedestrian injury frequently results in devastating and costly injuries and accounts for 11% of all road user fatalities. In the United States in 2006 there were 4,784 fatalities and 61,000 injuries from pedestrian injury, and in 2007 there were 4,654 fatalities and 70,000 injuries. In Canada, injury is the leading cause of death for those under 45 years of age and the fourth most common cause of death for all ages Traumatic pedestrian injury results in nearly 4000 hospitalizations in Canada annually. These injuries result from the interplay of modifiable environmental factors. The objective of this study was to determine links between the built environment and pedestrian injury hotspots in Vancouver.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 169 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 30 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 21%
Engineering 37 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,452,220
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,871
of 17,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,865
of 123,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#21
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.