↓ Skip to main content

Ontology-driven indexing of public datasets for translational bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
19 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ontology-driven indexing of public datasets for translational bioinformatics
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-s2-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nigam H Shah, Clement Jonquet, Annie P Chiang, Atul J Butte, Rong Chen, Mark A Musen

Abstract

The volume of publicly available genomic scale data is increasing. Genomic datasets in public repositories are annotated with free-text fields describing the pathological state of the studied sample. These annotations are not mapped to concepts in any ontology, making it difficult to integrate these datasets across repositories. We have previously developed methods to map text-annotations of tissue microarrays to concepts in the NCI thesaurus and SNOMED-CT. In this work we generalize our methods to map text annotations of gene expression datasets to concepts in the UMLS. We demonstrate the utility of our methods by processing annotations of datasets in the Gene Expression Omnibus. We demonstrate that we enable ontology-based querying and integration of tissue and gene expression microarray data. We enable identification of datasets on specific diseases across both repositories. Our approach provides the basis for ontology-driven data integration for translational research on gene and protein expression data. Based on this work we have built a prototype system for ontology based annotation and indexing of biomedical data. The system processes the text metadata of diverse resource elements such as gene expression data sets, descriptions of radiology images, clinical-trial reports, and PubMed article abstracts to annotate and index them with concepts from appropriate ontologies. The key functionality of this system is to enable users to locate biomedical data resources related to particular ontology concepts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 26 15%
United Kingdom 5 3%
France 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 129 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 11%
Student > Master 18 10%
Professor 9 5%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 8 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 63 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 14 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,023
of 7,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,589
of 170,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#20
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.