You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
General and specific responsiveness of the amygdala during explicit emotion recognition in females and males
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-10-91 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Birgit Derntl, Ute Habel, Christian Windischberger, Simon Robinson, Ilse Kryspin-Exner, Ruben C Gur, Ewald Moser |
| Abstract |
The ability to recognize emotions in facial expressions relies on an extensive neural network with the amygdala as the key node as has typically been demonstrated for the processing of fearful stimuli. A sufficient characterization of the factors influencing and modulating amygdala function, however, has not been reached now. Due to lacking or diverging results on its involvement in recognizing all or only certain negative emotions, the influence of gender or ethnicity is still under debate. This high-resolution fMRI study addresses some of the relevant parameters, such as emotional valence, gender and poser ethnicity on amygdala activation during facial emotion recognition in 50 Caucasian subjects. Stimuli were color photographs of emotional Caucasian and African American faces. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 20% |
| Researcher | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 86 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,210,743
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#350
of 1,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,301
of 110,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.