You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving the organization of palliative care: identification of barriers and facilitators in five European countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-014-0130-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jasper van Riet Paap, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Frederike Brouwer, Franka Meiland, Steve Iliffe, Nathan Davies, Wojciech Leppert, Birgit Jaspers, Elena Mariani, Ragni Sommerbakk, Kris Vissers, Yvonne Engels |
| Abstract |
Interventions to improve palliative care encounter challenges beyond the usual implementation problems because of palliative care's complex and changing character. In this study, we explored barriers and facilitators faced by health-care professionals in five European countries (England, Germany, Italy, Norway and the Netherlands) with regard to improving the organization of their palliative care service. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,262,276
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,694
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,513
of 255,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#60
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.