You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-015-0284-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Moher, Marc Avey, Gerd Antes, Douglas G Altman |
Abstract |
The quality of reporting clinical and preclinical research is not optimal. Reporting guidelines can help make reports of research more complete and transparent, thus increasing their value and making them more useful to all readers. Getting reporting guidelines into practice is complex and expensive, and involves several stakeholders, including prospective authors, peer reviewers, journal editors, guideline developers, and implementation scientists. Working together will help ensure their maximum uptake and penetration. We are all responsible for helping to ensure that all research is reported so completely that it is of value to everybody. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 25% |
Spain | 4 | 8% |
Germany | 3 | 6% |
Ireland | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 54% |
Scientists | 11 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 11 | 24% |
Researcher | 11 | 24% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,174,808
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#814
of 3,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,211
of 257,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#20
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.