↓ Skip to main content

Acceptability and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for influencing sedentary time at work: focus group interviews in executives and employees

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceptability and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for influencing sedentary time at work: focus group interviews in executives and employees
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12966-015-0177-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrien De Cocker, Charlene Veldeman, Dirk De Bacquer, Lutgart Braeckman, Neville Owen, Greet Cardon, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Abstract

Occupational sitting can be the largest contributor to overall daily sitting time in white-collar workers. With adverse health effects in adults, intervention strategies to influence sedentary time on a working day are needed. Therefore, the present aim was to examine employees' and executives' reflections on occupational sitting and to examine the potential acceptability and feasibility of intervention strategies to reduce and interrupt sedentary time on a working day.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 222 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 14 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 52 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 12%
Psychology 26 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 11%
Sports and Recreations 21 9%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 65 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,116,693
of 19,088,857 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#863
of 1,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,495
of 225,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,088,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them