You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acceptability and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for influencing sedentary time at work: focus group interviews in executives and employees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-015-0177-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrien De Cocker, Charlene Veldeman, Dirk De Bacquer, Lutgart Braeckman, Neville Owen, Greet Cardon, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij |
| Abstract |
Occupational sitting can be the largest contributor to overall daily sitting time in white-collar workers. With adverse health effects in adults, intervention strategies to influence sedentary time on a working day are needed. Therefore, the present aim was to examine employees' and executives' reflections on occupational sitting and to examine the potential acceptability and feasibility of intervention strategies to reduce and interrupt sedentary time on a working day. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 28% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 74 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 12% |
| Psychology | 30 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 22 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 86 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,910,806
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,031
of 1,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,760
of 256,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#24
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.