You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Public health: disconnections between policy, practice and research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-8-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria WJ Jansen, Hans AM van Oers, Gerjo Kok, Nanne K de Vries |
| Abstract |
Public health includes policy, practice and research but to sufficiently connect academic research, practice and public health policy appears to be difficult. Collaboration between policy, practice and research is imperative to obtaining more solid evidence in public health. However, the three domains do not easily work together because they emanate from three more or less independent 'niches'.Work cycles of each niche have the same successive steps: problem recognition, approach formulation, implementation, and evaluation, but are differently worked out. So far, the research has focused on agenda-setting which belongs to the first step, as expressed by Kingdon, and on the use of academic knowledge in policy makers' decision-making processes which belongs to the fourth step, as elaborated by Weiss. In addition, there are more steps in the policy-making process where exchange is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 18% |
| Researcher | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 59 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Psychology | 14 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,950,763
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#792
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,703
of 180,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.