↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-s3-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tania Islam, Maznah Dahlui, Hazreen Abd Majid, Azmi Mohamed Nahar, Nur Aishah Mohd Taib, Tin Tin Su, MyBCC study group

Abstract

The breast cancer survival rate is the highest among all types of cancers, and survivors returning to work after completing treatment is extremely important in regards to economy and rehabilitation. The aim of this systematic review study is to identify the prevalence of breast cancer survivors who return to work (RTW) and the factors associated to RTW.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 282 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 84 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 13%
Social Sciences 26 9%
Psychology 18 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 97 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,739,328
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,009
of 17,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,012
of 369,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.