↓ Skip to main content

Do corticosteroids reduce the mortality of influenza A (H1N1) infection? A meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do corticosteroids reduce the mortality of influenza A (H1N1) infection? A meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0764-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Zhang, Wenjie Sun, Erik R Svendsen, Song Tang, Raina C MacIntyre, Peng Yang, Daitao Zhang, Quanyi Wang

Abstract

Corticosteroids are used empirically in influenza A (H1N1) treatment despite lack of clear evidence for effective treatment. This study aims to assess the efficacy of corticosteroids treatment for H1N1 infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,609,829
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,422
of 6,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,703
of 400,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#118
of 546 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 546 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.