↓ Skip to main content

Modern radiation therapy and potential fertility preservation strategies in patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiation

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modern radiation therapy and potential fertility preservation strategies in patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiation
Published in
Radiation Oncology, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13014-015-0353-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pirus Ghadjar, Volker Budach, Christhardt Köhler, Andreas Jantke, Simone Marnitz

Abstract

Young patients with cervical cancer who undergo chemoradiation might be interested in fertility preservation, not only dependent upon the use of a gestational carrier as maybe achieved by the use of ovarian transposition and cryo-conservation of oocytes or ovarian tissue, but may prefer to carry pregnancy to term after cancer treatment. The latter approach is a non-established concept needing both modern radiation therapy approaches as well as modifications -if at all possible- in current recommendations for target volume delineation to spare dose to the unaffected uterus. Future strategies to serve selected patients in this respect should only be conducted in prospective clinical evaluations and are critically discussed in this article.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,788,263
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#329
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,520
of 255,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#15
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.