You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does access to a colorectal cancer screening website and/or a nurse-managed telephone help line provided to patients by their family physician increase fecal occult blood test uptake?: results from a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-14-263 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathleen Clouston, Alan Katz, Patricia J Martens, Jeff Sisler, Donna Turner, Michelle Lobchuk, Susan McClement, Gary Crow, the CIHR/CCMB Team in Primary Care Oncology (PCO-NET) |
Abstract |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a patient decision aid (nurse-managed telephone support line and/or colorectal cancer screening website), distributed to patients by their family physician, in improving fecal occult blood test (FOBT) colorectal cancer screening rates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 105 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
Researcher | 14 | 13% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 25% |
Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Psychology | 6 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 18% |
Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,676,511
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,619
of 8,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,132
of 203,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#65
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.