↓ Skip to main content

Economic considerations and health in all policies initiatives: evidence from interviews with key informants in Sweden, Quebec and South Australia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic considerations and health in all policies initiatives: evidence from interviews with key informants in Sweden, Quebec and South Australia
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1350-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D Pinto, Agnes Molnar, Ketan Shankardass, Patricia J O’Campo, Ahmed M Bayoumi

Abstract

Health in All Policies (HiAP) is a form of intersectoral action that aims to include the promotion of health in government initiatives across sectors. To date, there has been little study of economic considerations within the implementation of HiAP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Social Sciences 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#614,503
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#595
of 16,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,354
of 261,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#12
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.