↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of forest malaria in Central Vietnam: the hidden parasite reservoir

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology of forest malaria in Central Vietnam: the hidden parasite reservoir
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0601-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pham Vinh Thanh, Nguyen Van Hong, Nguyen Van Van, Carine Van Malderen, Valérie Obsomer, Anna Rosanas-Urgell, Koen Peeters Grietens, Nguyen Xuan Xa, Germana Bancone, Nongnud Chowwiwat, Tran Thanh Duong, Umberto D’Alessandro, Niko Speybroeck, Annette Erhart

Abstract

After successfully reducing the malaria burden to pre-elimination levels over the past two decades, the national malaria programme in Vietnam has recently switched from control to elimination. However, in forested areas of Central Vietnam malaria elimination is likely to be jeopardized by the high occurrence of asymptomatic and submicroscopic infections as shown by previous reports. This paper presents the results of a malaria survey carried out in a remote forested area of Central Vietnam where we evaluated malaria prevalence and risk factors for infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#13,079,409
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,275
of 5,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,686
of 255,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#42
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.