↓ Skip to main content

Eliminating malaria vectors

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eliminating malaria vectors
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerry F Killeen, Aklilu Seyoum, Chadwick Sikaala, Amri S Zomboko, John E Gimnig, Nicodem J Govella, Michael T White

Abstract

Malaria vectors which predominantly feed indoors upon humans have been locally eliminated from several settings with insecticide treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying or larval source management. Recent dramatic declines of An. gambiae in east Africa with imperfect ITN coverage suggest mosquito populations can rapidly collapse when forced below realistically achievable, non-zero thresholds of density and supporting resource availability. Here we explain why insecticide-based mosquito elimination strategies are feasible, desirable and can be extended to a wider variety of species by expanding the vector control arsenal to cover a broader spectrum of the resources they need to survive. The greatest advantage of eliminating mosquitoes, rather than merely controlling them, is that this precludes local selection for behavioural or physiological resistance traits. The greatest challenges are therefore to achieve high biological coverage of targeted resources rapidly enough to prevent local emergence of resistance and to then continually exclude, monitor for and respond to re-invasion from external populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
Madagascar 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 239 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 16%
Student > Postgraduate 25 10%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 44 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 11%
Environmental Science 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 48 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#14,717,475
of 25,070,356 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,526
of 5,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,396
of 203,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#25
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,070,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.