You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evolutionary history and leaf succulence as explanations for medicinal use in aloes and the global popularity of Aloe vera
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12862-015-0291-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Olwen M Grace, Sven Buerki, Matthew Symonds, Félix Forest, Abraham E van Wyk, Gideon F Smith, Ronell R Klopper, Charlotte S Bjorå, Sophie Neale, Sebsebe Demissew, Monique Simmonds, Nina Rønsted |
Abstract |
Aloe vera supports a substantial global trade yet its wild origins, and explanations for its popularity over 500 related Aloe species in one of the world's largest succulent groups, have remained uncertain. We developed an explicit phylogenetic framework to explore links between the rich traditions of medicinal use and leaf succulence in aloes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Hungary | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 181 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
Researcher | 24 | 13% |
Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 7% |
Chemistry | 10 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 13% |
Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#515,022
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#88
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,653
of 360,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.