↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary history and leaf succulence as explanations for medicinal use in aloes and the global popularity of Aloe vera

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary history and leaf succulence as explanations for medicinal use in aloes and the global popularity of Aloe vera
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0291-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olwen M Grace, Sven Buerki, Matthew Symonds, Félix Forest, Abraham E van Wyk, Gideon F Smith, Ronell R Klopper, Charlotte S Bjorå, Sophie Neale, Sebsebe Demissew, Monique Simmonds, Nina Rønsted

Abstract

Aloe vera supports a substantial global trade yet its wild origins, and explanations for its popularity over 500 related Aloe species in one of the world's largest succulent groups, have remained uncertain. We developed an explicit phylogenetic framework to explore links between the rich traditions of medicinal use and leaf succulence in aloes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 181 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 49 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 12%
Environmental Science 14 7%
Chemistry 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#515,022
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#88
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,653
of 360,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.