You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
BioPreDyn-bench: a suite of benchmark problems for dynamic modelling in systems biology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12918-015-0144-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandro F Villaverde, David Henriques, Kieran Smallbone, Sophia Bongard, Joachim Schmid, Damjan Cicin-Sain, Anton Crombach, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Klaus Mauch, Eva Balsa-Canto, Pedro Mendes, Johannes Jaeger, Julio R Banga |
| Abstract |
Dynamic modelling is one of the cornerstones of systems biology. Many research efforts are currently being invested in the development and exploitation of large-scale kinetic models. The associated problems of parameter estimation (model calibration) and optimal experimental design are particularly challenging. The community has already developed many methods and software packages which aim to facilitate these tasks. However, there is a lack of suitable benchmark problems which allow a fair and systematic evaluation and comparison of these contributions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 119 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 27% |
| Researcher | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 14% |
| Engineering | 17 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,640,015
of 24,742,536 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#63
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,220
of 259,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,742,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.