↓ Skip to main content

Using logistic regression to improve the prognostic value of microarray gene expression data sets: application to early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and triple negative breast carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using logistic regression to improve the prognostic value of microarray gene expression data sets: application to early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and triple negative breast carcinoma
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1755-8794-7-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W Mount, Charles W Putnam, Sara M Centouri, Ann M Manziello, Ritu Pandey, Linda L Garland, Jesse D Martinez

Abstract

Numerous microarray-based prognostic gene expression signatures of primary neoplasms have been published but often with little concurrence between studies, thus limiting their clinical utility. We describe a methodology using logistic regression, which circumvents limitations of conventional Kaplan Meier analysis. We applied this approach to a thrice-analyzed and published squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) of the lung data set, with the objective of identifying gene expressions predictive of early death versus long survival in early-stage disease. A similar analysis was applied to a data set of triple negative breast carcinoma cases, which present similar clinical challenges.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 6 16%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Computer Science 4 11%
Engineering 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 21%