↓ Skip to main content

Septic encephalopathy: when cytokines interact with acetylcholine in the brain

Overview of attention for article published in Military Medical Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Septic encephalopathy: when cytokines interact with acetylcholine in the brain
Published in
Military Medical Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2054-9369-1-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qing-Hong Zhang, Zhi-Yong Sheng, Yong-Ming Yao

Abstract

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a brain dysfunction that occurs secondary to infection in the body, characterized by alteration of consciousness, ranging from delirium to coma, seizure or focal neurological signs. SAE involves a number of mechanisms, including neuroinflammation, in which the interaction between cytokines and acetylcholine results in neuronal loss and alterations in cholinergic signaling. Moreover, the interaction also occurs in the periphery, accelerating a type of immunosuppressive state. Although its diagnosis is not specific in biochemistry and imaging tests, it could potentiate severe outcomes, including increased mortality, cognitive decline, progressive immunosuppression, cholinergic anti-inflammatory deficiency, and even metabolic and hydroelectrolyte imbalance. Therefore, the bilateral communication between SAE and the multiple peripheral organs and especially the immune system should be emphasized in sepsis management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 60%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,831,305
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from Military Medical Research
#86
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,347
of 248,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Military Medical Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.