You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What features do Dutch university students prefer in a smartphone application for promotion of physical activity? A qualitative approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-015-0189-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anouk Middelweerd, Danielle M van der Laan, Maartje M van Stralen, Julia S Mollee, Mirjam Stuij, Saskia J te Velde, Johannes Brug |
| Abstract |
The transition from adolescence to early adulthood is a critical period in which there is a decline in physical activity (PA). College and university students make up a large segment of this age group. Smartphones may be used to promote and support PA. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore Dutch students' preferences regarding a PA application (PA app) for smartphones. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 47% |
| Scientists | 9 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 330 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 14% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 17% |
| Unknown | 59 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 11% |
| Psychology | 38 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 85 | 25% |
| Unknown | 69 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,911,833
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#739
of 1,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,233
of 257,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#21
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.