You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New anthropometry-based age- and sex-specific reference values for urinary 24-hour creatinine excretion based on the adult Swiss population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-015-0275-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentina Forni Ogna, Adam Ogna, Philippe Vuistiner, Menno Pruijm, Belen Ponte, Daniel Ackermann, Luca Gabutti, Nima Vakilzadeh, Markus Mohaupt, Pierre-Yves Martin, Idris Guessous, Antoinette Péchère-Bertschi, Fred Paccaud, Murielle Bochud, Michel Burnier |
| Abstract |
Urinary creatinine excretion is used as a marker of completeness of timed urine collections, which are a keystone of several metabolic evaluations in clinical investigations and epidemiological surveys. The current reference values for 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion rely on observations performed in the 1960s and 1970s in relatively small and mostly selected groups, and may thus poorly fit to the present-day general European population. The aim of this study was to establish and validate anthropometry-based age- and sex-specific reference values of the 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion on adult populations with preserved renal function. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#13,786,422
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,890
of 3,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,785
of 256,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#64
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.