↓ Skip to main content

Supported by science?: What Canadian naturopaths advertise to the public

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 930)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
798 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supported by science?: What Canadian naturopaths advertise to the public
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-7-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Caulfield, Christen Rachul

Abstract

The increasing popularity of complementary and alternative medicines in Canada has led to regulatory reforms in Ontario and British Columbia. Yet the evidence for efficacy of these therapies is still a source of debate. Those who are supportive of naturopathic medicine often support the field by claiming that the naturopathic treatments are supported by science and scientific research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 798 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 25%
Student > Master 12 23%
Other 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 665. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#33,112
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#1
of 930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90
of 139,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them