↓ Skip to main content

The role of menopause and reproductive senescence in a long-lived social mammal

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of menopause and reproductive senescence in a long-lived social mammal
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-6-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric J Ward, Kim Parsons, Elizabeth E Holmes, Ken C Balcomb, John KB Ford

Abstract

Menopause is a seemingly maladaptive life-history trait that is found in many long-lived mammals. There are two competing evolutionary hypotheses for this phenomenon; in the adaptive view of menopause, the cessation of reproduction may increase the fitness of older females; in the non-adaptive view, menopause may be explained by physiological deterioration with age. The decline and eventual cessation of reproduction has been documented in a number of mammalian species, however the evolutionary cause of this trait is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 216 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 19%
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Student > Master 32 14%
Other 9 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 47%
Environmental Science 23 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 52 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,212,628
of 25,199,243 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#134
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,876
of 186,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.