↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the applicability of the Immuno‐solid‐phase allergen chip (ISAC) assay in atopic patients in Singapore

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the applicability of the Immuno‐solid‐phase allergen chip (ISAC) assay in atopic patients in Singapore
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13601-015-0053-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelia Santosa, Anand Kumar Andiappan, Olaf Rotzschke, Hung Chew Wong, Amanda Chang, Mei Bigliardi-Qi, De-Yun Wang, Paul Lorenz Bigliardi

Abstract

Molecular-based allergy diagnostics are gaining popularity in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate their role in the tropics, given the inherent genetic and environmental differences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#665
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,578
of 270,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#29
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.