↓ Skip to main content

An epigenetic map of age-associated autosomal loci in northern European families at high risk for the metabolic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An epigenetic map of age-associated autosomal loci in northern European families at high risk for the metabolic syndrome
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13148-015-0048-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar Ali, Diana Cerjak, Jack W Kent, Roland James, John Blangero, Melanie A Carless, Yi Zhang

Abstract

The prevalence of chronic diseases such as cancer, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome (MetS), and cardiovascular disease increases with age in all populations. Epigenetic features are hypothesized to play important roles in the pathophysiology of age-associated diseases, but a map of these markers is lacking. We searched for genome-wide age-associated methylation signatures in peripheral blood of individuals at high risks for MetS by profiling 485,000 CpG sites in 192 individuals of Northern European ancestry using the Illumina HM450 array. Subjects (ages 6-85 years) were part of seven extended families, and 73% of adults and 32% of children were overweight or obese.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,918,641
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#612
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,278
of 254,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#26
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.