Title |
Do COX-2 inhibitors provide additional pain relief and anti-inflammatory effects in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are on biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and/or corticosteroids? Post-hoc analyses from a randomized clinical trial with etoricoxib
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12891-015-0468-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tore K Kvien, Maria Greenwald, Paul M Peloso, Hongwei Wang, Anish Mehta, Arnold Gammaitoni |
Abstract |
Our objective was to evaluate the effect of background biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and/or corticosteroids (CS) on response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The following efficacy endpoints were evaluated using time-weighted change from baseline in a 12-week, randomized controlled clinical trial with etoricoxib: Patient Global Assessment of Pain, Swollen Joint Count, Tender Joint Count, Health Assessment Questionnaire. The following three treatment groups were evaluated: placebo, pooled etoricoxib 10/30/60 mg, and etoricoxib 90 mg. Screening values, values post flare, as well as changes after treatment were analyzed. Of the 1014 patients screened, 761 were randomized; 50% were on no background bDMARDs and/or CS therapy, 23% used bDMARDs, 34% used CS, and 8% used both bDMARDs and CS. It was demonstrated that RA patients on bDMARDs or CS had similar pain levels at screening as patients without this co-medication. They experienced flare upon NSAID withdrawal and demonstrated dose-dependent pain improvement with etoricoxib. These results support that RA patients receiving bDMARDs or CS may still require the use of concomitant analgesics to treat pain. Clinicians should continue to monitor and treat pain even after initiating a bDMARD and/or CS. [clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00264147 ]. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 31% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 16% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 34% |