↓ Skip to main content

AtEAF1 is a potential platform protein for Arabidopsis NuA4 acetyltransferase complex

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AtEAF1 is a potential platform protein for Arabidopsis NuA4 acetyltransferase complex
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12870-015-0461-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomasz Bieluszewski, Lukasz Galganski, Weronika Sura, Anna Bieluszewska, Mateusz Abram, Agnieszka Ludwikow, Piotr Andrzej Ziolkowski, Jan Sadowski

Abstract

Histone acetyltransferase complex NuA4 and histone variant exchanging complex SWR1 are two chromatin modifying complexes which act cooperatively in yeast and share some intriguing structural similarities. Protein subunits of NuA4 and SWR1-C are highly conserved across eukaryotes, but form different multiprotein arrangements. For example, the human TIP60-p400 complex consists of homologues of both yeast NuA4 and SWR1-C subunits, combining subunits necessary for histone acetylation and histone variant exchange. It is currently not known what protein complexes are formed by the plant homologues of NuA4 and SWR1-C subunits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,255,458
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#202
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,201
of 257,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#6
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.