↓ Skip to main content

A rationale and model for addressing tobacco dependence in substance abuse treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A rationale and model for addressing tobacco dependence in substance abuse treatment
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1747-597x-1-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimber P Richter, Julia H Arnsten

Abstract

Most persons in drug treatment smoke cigarettes. Until drug treatment facilities systematically treat their patients' tobacco use, millions will flow through the drug treatment system, overcome their primary drug of abuse, but die prematurely from tobacco-related illnesses. This paper reviews the literature on the health benefits of quitting smoking for drug treatment patients, whether smoking causes relapse to other drug or alcohol abuse, the treatment of tobacco dependence, and good and bad times for quitting smoking among drug treatment patients. It also presents a conceptual model and recommendations for treating tobacco in substance abuse treatment, and provides references to internet and paper-copy tools and information for treating tobacco dependence. At present, research on tobacco treatment in drug treatment is in its infancy. Although few drug treatment programs currently offer formal services, many more will likely begin to treat nicotine dependence as external forces and patient demand for these services increases. In the absence of clear guidelines and attention to quality of care, drug treatment programs may adopt smoking cessation services based on cost, convenience, or selection criteria other than efficacy. Because research in this field is relatively new, substance abuse treatment professionals should adhere to the standards of care for the general population, but be prepared to update their practices with emerging interventions that have proven to be effective for patients in drug treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Psychology 14 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#13,653,716
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#486
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,824
of 66,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.