You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic mapping protocol: what are the impacts of different upstream business models in the agriculture and forestry sector on sustainable development in tropical developing countries?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-4-1 |
| Authors |
George Schoneveld, Filipe Di Matteo, Frederico Brandao, Pablo Pacheco, Idsert Jelsma, Eileen Dyer Jarnholt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Nepal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 2% |
| Professor | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,185,440
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#234
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,896
of 274,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.