↓ Skip to main content

Clinically significant association between the maximum standardized uptake value on 18F-FDG PET and expression of phosphorylated Akt and S6 kinase for prediction of the biological characteristics of…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinically significant association between the maximum standardized uptake value on 18F-FDG PET and expression of phosphorylated Akt and S6 kinase for prediction of the biological characteristics of renal cell cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1097-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoya Mizuno, Takao Kamai, Hideyuki Abe, Setsu Sakamoto, Kazuhiro Kitajima, Daisaku Nishihara, Hideo Yuki, Tsunehito Kambara, Hironori Betsunoh, Masahiro Yashi, Yoshitatsu Fukabori, Yasushi Kaji, Ken-Ichiro Yoshida

Abstract

The relationship between the clinicopathological features and molecular changes associated with standardized uptake value (SUV) determined by Positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET) in human renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has not been elucidated. On the other hand, overactivation of the phosphatidylinositol 3'kinase (PI3K), serine/threonine kinase Akt, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway has been detected in a variety of human cancers, including RCC. So far, little is known about the relationship between the SUV and these proteins in human RCC. Thus, it is important to study the relevance of SUV with clinicopathological features in human RCCs from a molecular point of view.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tunisia 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Lecturer 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Unspecified 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#12,919,128
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,718
of 8,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,482
of 258,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#58
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.