↓ Skip to main content

Biobank resources for future patient care: developments, principles and concepts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biobank resources for future patient care: developments, principles and concepts
Published in
Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/2043-9113-1-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ákos Végvári, Charlotte Welinder, Henrik Lindberg, Thomas E Fehniger, György Marko-Varga

Abstract

The aim of the overview is to give a perspective of global biobank development is given in a view of positioning biobanking as a key resource for healthcare to identify new potential markers that can be used in patient diagnosis and complement the targeted personalized drug treatment. The fast progression of biobanks around the world is becoming an important resource for society where the patient benefit is in the focus, with a high degree of personal integrity and ethical standard. Biobanks are providing patient benefits by large scale screening studies, generating large database repositories. It is envisioned by all participating stakeholders that the biobank initiatives will become the future gateway to discover new frontiers within life science and patient care. There is a great importance of biobank establishment globally, as biobanks has been identified as a key area for development in order to speed up the discovery and development of new drugs and protein biomarker diagnostics. One of the major objectives in Europe is to establish concerted actions, where biobank networks are being developed in order to combine and have the opportunity to share and build new science and understanding from complex disease biology. These networks are currently building bridges to facilitate the establishments of best practice and standardizations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Finland 1 1%
North Macedonia 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 56 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 18%
Computer Science 6 9%
Chemical Engineering 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 4 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,077,136
of 18,925,022 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics
#4
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,866
of 113,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,925,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them