You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter: surrogate of central venous pressure or parameter of fluid responsiveness? Let the physiology reply
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11824 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Bodson, Antoine Vieillard-Baron |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 70% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Design | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,970,068
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,855
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,624
of 292,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.