↓ Skip to main content

Retrospective analyses of trends in pancreatic surgery: indications, operative techniques, and postoperative outcome of 1,120 pancreatic resections

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retrospective analyses of trends in pancreatic surgery: indications, operative techniques, and postoperative outcome of 1,120 pancreatic resections
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12957-015-0525-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uwe A Wittel, Frank Makowiec, Olivia Sick, Gabriel J Seifert, Tobias Keck, Ulrich Adam, Ulrich T Hopt

Abstract

Hospital volume, surgeons' experience, and adequate management of complications are factors that contribute to a better outcome after pancreatic resections. The aim of our study was to analyze trends in indications, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcome in more than 1,100 pancreatic resections. One thousand one hundred twenty pancreatic resections were performed since 1994. The vast majority of operations were performed by three surgeons. Perioperative data were documented in a pancreatic database. For the purpose of our analysis, the study period was sub-classified into three periods (A 1994 to 2001/n = 363; B 2001 to 2006/n = 305; C since 2007 to 2012/n = 452). The median patient age increased from 51 (A) to 65 years (C; P < 0.001). Indications for surgery were pancreatic/periampullary cancer (49%), chronic pancreatitis (CP; 33%), and various other lesions (18%). About two thirds of the operations were pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomies. The frequency of mesenterico-portal vein resections increased from 8% (A) to 20% (C; P < 0.01). The overall mortality was 2.4% and comparable in all three periods (2.8%, 2.0%, 2.4%; P = 0.8). Overall complication rates increased from 42% (A) to 56% (C; P < 0.01). Mortality remained low despite a more aggressive surgical approach to pancreatic disease. An increased overall morbidity may be explained by more clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas and better documentation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#573
of 2,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,197
of 274,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#26
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.