You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of first exposure to plain cigarette packaging on smoking behaviour and attitudes: a randomised controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-015-1586-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olivia M Maynard, Ute Leonards, Angela S Attwood, Linda Bauld, Lee Hogarth, Marcus R Munafò |
| Abstract |
Plain packaging requires tobacco products to be sold in packs with a standard shape, method of opening and colour, leaving the brand name in a standard font and location. We ran a randomised controlled trial to investigate the impact of plain packaging on smoking behaviour and attitudes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 46% |
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#568,003
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#547
of 16,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,810
of 267,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.