You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Working memory deficits in adults with ADHD: is there evidence for subtype differences?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-2-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie B Schweitzer, Russell B Hanford, Deborah R Medoff |
| Abstract |
Working memory performance is important for maintaining functioning in cognitive, academic and social activities. Previous research suggests there are prevalent working memory deficits in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). There is now a growing body of literature characterizing working memory functioning according to ADHD subtypes in children. The expression of working memory deficits in adults with ADHD and how they vary according to subtype, however, remains to be more fully documented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 233% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 167% |
| Researcher | 13 | 144% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 122% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 100% |
| Other | 31 | 344% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 578% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 178% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 100% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 67% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 44% |
| Other | 10 | 111% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,674,991
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#85
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,670
of 168,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.