↓ Skip to main content

Allergy to cooked, but not raw, peas: a case series and review

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allergy to cooked, but not raw, peas: a case series and review
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13223-015-0077-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elissa M Abrams, Thomas V Gerstner

Abstract

Allergic reactions to legumes are common.Food allergy to cooked, but not raw, pea has been rarely reported in the literature. This case series describes five children who had various IgE-mediated symptoms upon consumption of cooked pea, but tolerated raw pea. Skin testing then confirmed positive responses to cooked, but not raw, peas. It is important to consider allergy to cooked legumes, even in the context of raw legume tolerance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 27%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,434,647
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#71
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,182
of 277,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.