↓ Skip to main content

Engineering microbes for tolerance to next-generation biofuels

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
466 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineering microbes for tolerance to next-generation biofuels
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-4-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary J Dunlop

Abstract

A major challenge when using microorganisms to produce bulk chemicals such as biofuels is that the production targets are often toxic to cells. Many biofuels are known to reduce cell viability through damage to the cell membrane and interference with essential physiological processes. Therefore, cells must trade off biofuel production and survival, reducing potential yields. Recently, there have been several efforts towards engineering strains for biofuel tolerance. Promising methods include engineering biofuel export systems, heat shock proteins, membrane modifications, more general stress responses, and approaches that integrate multiple tolerance strategies. In addition, in situ recovery methods and media supplements can help to ease the burden of end-product toxicity and may be used in combination with genetic approaches. Recent advances in systems and synthetic biology provide a framework for tolerance engineering. This review highlights recent targeted approaches towards improving microbial tolerance to next-generation biofuels with a particular emphasis on strategies that will improve production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 466 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 4%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 431 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 25%
Researcher 73 16%
Student > Master 72 15%
Student > Bachelor 57 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 72 15%
Unknown 48 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 210 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 88 19%
Engineering 48 10%
Chemical Engineering 23 5%
Chemistry 9 2%
Other 30 6%
Unknown 58 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#318
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,336
of 141,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.