You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A randomised controlled feasibility trial of family and social network intervention for young people who misuse alcohol and drugs: study protocol (Y-SBNT)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-015-0004-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Judith Watson, Donna Back, Paul Toner, Charlie Lloyd, Ed Day, Louca-Mai Brady, Lorna Templeton, Sangeeta Ambegaokar, Steve Parrott, David Torgerson, Kim Cocks, Eilish Gilvarry, Paul McArdle, Alex Copello |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 73% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
Researcher | 9 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Professor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 13 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 11 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,354,375
of 24,036,420 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#126
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,275
of 264,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,036,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.