↓ Skip to main content

Human Dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs): isolation, enrichment and comparative differentiation of two sub-populations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Developmental Biology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 369)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs): isolation, enrichment and comparative differentiation of two sub-populations
Published in
BMC Developmental Biology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12861-015-0065-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandra Pisciotta, Gianluca Carnevale, Simona Meloni, Massimo Riccio, Sara De Biasi, Lara Gibellini, Adriano Ferrari, Giacomo Bruzzesi, Anto De Pol

Abstract

Human dental pulp represents a suitable alternative source of stem cells for the purpose of cell-based therapies in regenerative medicine, because it is relatively easy to obtain it, using low invasive procedures. This study characterized and compared two subpopulations of adult stem cells derived from human dental pulp (hDPSCs). Human DPSCs, formerly immune-selected for STRO-1 and c-Kit, were separated for negativity and positivity to CD34 expression respectively, and evaluated for cell proliferation, stemness maintenance, cell senescence and multipotency. The STRO-1(+)/c-Kit(+)/CD34(+) hDPSCs showed a slower proliferation, gradual loss of stemness, early cell senescence and apoptosis, compared to STRO-1(+)/c-Kit(+)/CD34(-) hDPSCs. Both the subpopulations demonstrated similar abilities to differentiate towards mesoderm lineages, whereas a significant difference was observed after the neurogenic induction, with a greater commitment of STRO-1(+)/c-Kit(+)/CD34(+) hDPSCs. Moreover, undifferentiated STRO-1(+)/c-Kit(+)/CD34(-) hDPSCs did not show any expression of CD271 and nestin, typical neural markers, while STRO-1(+)/c-Kit(+)/CD34(+) hDPSCs expressed both. These results suggest that STRO-1(+)/c-Kit(+)/CD34(-) hDPSCs and STRO-1(+)/c-Kit(+)/CD34(+) hDPSCs might represent two distinct stem cell populations, with different properties. These results trigger further analyses to deeply investigate the hypothesis that more than a single stem cell population resides within the dental pulp, to better define the flexibility of application of hDPSCs in regenerative medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 15%
Materials Science 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 36 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,638,721
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Developmental Biology
#9
of 369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,756
of 261,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Developmental Biology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.