↓ Skip to main content

Prehospital endotracheal intubation: elemental or detrimental?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prehospital endotracheal intubation: elemental or detrimental?
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0808-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul E Pepe, Lynn P Roppolo, Raymond L Fowler

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2015 and co-published as a series in Critical Care. Other articles in the series can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2015 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 23%
Student > Master 19 15%
Other 13 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 19%
Engineering 5 4%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,418,577
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,225
of 6,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,274
of 397,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#77
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.