↓ Skip to main content

Rapid response systems: are they really effective?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid response systems: are they really effective?
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0807-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Sandroni, Sonia D’Arrigo, Massimo Antonelli

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2015 and co-published as a series in Critical Care. Other articles in the series can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2015 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Computer Science 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,232,873
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,509
of 6,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,691
of 387,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#296
of 575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.