↓ Skip to main content

Rapid response systems: are they really effective?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid response systems: are they really effective?
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0807-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Sandroni, Sonia D’Arrigo, Massimo Antonelli

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2015 and co-published as a series in Critical Care. Other articles in the series can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2015 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 19%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Postgraduate 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Computer Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,766,299
of 13,047,561 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,480
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,849
of 216,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,047,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.