↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring response to gefitinib in nude mouse tumor xenografts by 18 F-FDG microPET-CT: correlation between 18 F-FDG uptake and pathological response

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring response to gefitinib in nude mouse tumor xenografts by 18 F-FDG microPET-CT: correlation between 18 F-FDG uptake and pathological response
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12957-015-0505-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Na Zhou, Ning Wu, Ying Liang, Kai Gao, Xiao-Ying Li, Lian-Feng Zhang

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) micro-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (microPET-CT) can be used to monitor a metabolic response to gefitinib in nude mouse tumor xenografts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Lecturer 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,402,666
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,011
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,079
of 261,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#47
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.