↓ Skip to main content

Global burden of sepsis: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global burden of sepsis: a systematic review
Published in
Critical Care, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/cc14101

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Lecturer 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 3 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,293,890
of 14,616,481 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,686
of 4,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,722
of 216,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,616,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.