↓ Skip to main content

Diffuse parenchymal lung disease as first clinical manifestation of GATA-2 deficiency in childhood

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diffuse parenchymal lung disease as first clinical manifestation of GATA-2 deficiency in childhood
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12890-015-0006-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Svobodova, Ester Mejstrikova, Ulrich Salzer, Martina Sukova, Petr Hubacek, Radoslav Matej, Martina Vasakova, Ludmila Hornofova, Marcela Dvorakova, Eva Fronkova, Felix Votava, Tomas Freiberger, Petr Pohunek, Jan Stary, Ales Janda

Abstract

GATA-2 transcription factor deficiency has recently been described in patients with a propensity towards myeloid malignancy associated with other highly variable phenotypic features: chronic leukocytopenias (dendritic cell-, monocyto-, granulocyto-, lymphocytopenia), increased susceptibility to infections, lymphatic vasculature abnormalities, and sensorineural deafness. Patients often suffer from opportunistic respiratory infections; chronic pulmonary changes have been found in advanced disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,806,069
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#961
of 1,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,876
of 357,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.